ESPN: Spurs could benefit most from a shortened season

On the latest edition of ESPN’s 5-on-5, a panel of writers gave their take on which player or team would benefit most from a shortened season?

Most ESPN analyst thinks that a lockout season with benefit Tim Duncan and the Spurs.

This is what they have to say:

J.A. Adande, The Spurs. They could’ve used a shorter season in 2010-11, when they finished off a 57-13 start by losing 12 times in their final 18 games, including a first-round series loss to the Grizzlies. They got injured and looked tired at the end. Fifty games must sound really appealing right about now.

Joe Gerrity, Hornets 247: The Spurs. They seem to be a little too old and creaky to go the distance lately. A shortened season could give them one more chance to steal a title before the dynasty fades into the distant past.

Zach Harper, Daily Dime Live: If he were on a team, I’d have a killer Eddy Curry joke right now.

Instead, I’ll say Tim Duncan. If we end up with a 50-game season again, Timmy will be able to give the Spurs more on offense. Even if the games are jammed together, he can really let opponents have it on the block.

Brendan Jackson of the Celtics Hub thinks the Miami Heat will benefit from a shortened because they are a young, athletic and streaky team and the trio of LeBron James, Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh could get it done for the Heat.

Jared Wade of 8 Points, 9 Seconds on the other hand, says that Dirk Nowitzki and the Dallas Mavericks would benefit most from it because the team have more confident right now, there a fewer games for the Heat have to coalesce and the Lakers have to get right. He believes that a short season will give the Mavericks a better chance to repeat.

Three of five ESPN analyst thinks the San Antonio Spurs have the advantage in shortened season partly because Duncan could be more effective and fresher come playoff time.

Also, it should be noted that the Spurs won their first ever NBA crown during the 1998-1999 season lockout season.

What do you think? Do you agree the Spurs will gain most from a shortened season? Share your thoughts.


7 thoughts on “ESPN: Spurs could benefit most from a shortened season

  1. Pingback: ESPN: Spurs could benefit most from a shortened season « Spurs … | | The Spurs StoreThe Spurs Store

  2. I’d like to believe the Spurs will benefit from this lockout season but I think it’s only slight advantage. A fresher Big three will surely help.

  3. The Spurs have a lot of work ahead of them, last season they won 61 games but fade out in the playoffs because the team is currently designed to succeed in the regular season, they need to move RJ to be competitive in the playoffs.

    I don’t see how they can take advantage of a lockout season. I’m Spurs fan, but I believe the Heat and Mavericks would benefit most in this scenario.

  4. They have a great point in picking the Spurs. The trio of Duncan, Ginobili and Parker is deadly and they have good role players to surround them. If Jefferson can play better, I believe Spurs have a great chance of winning a title before Duncan retires.

  5. Pingback: What does the future hold for the Spurs? « Spurs World – "Everything about the San Antonio Spurs and more…"

  6. Pingback: Spurs would face quandary in addressing their need for a big man « Spurs World

Speak your Mind...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s